logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2019.05.31 2019고단422
공무집행방해
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

C is the owner of “E” in Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, and the rest of the Defendants are the visitors to the above singing practice room.

At around 23:40 on July 28, 2018, the Defendants: (a) filed a 112 report to the effect that the Defendants were engaged in alcoholic beverage sales and gambling in the instant singing practice room, and intended to control the scene and take a field photograph; (b) Defendant A expressed that “I want to do so,” “I want to do so,” and (c) expressed that I would like to see that I would like to do so, “I will do so, I will do so,” and (d) expressed three times the vessels of the above police officer, a police officer, at one time on the hand, if I want to send the F, and then the police officer attempted to arrest Defendant B as a flagrant offender. The Defendants B’s body was pushed the F of the above police officer who attempted to control Defendant B, and C maintained the F’s body, and maintained the F’s hand of Defendant B, who was able to do so by Defendant B.

As a result, the Defendants conspired in collusion with police officers, thereby obstructing the handling of 112 reported duties by F and G 112 police officers, and the legitimate execution of duties concerning the crackdown on illegal alcoholic beverages in singing practice rooms.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Case photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation;

1. Relevant Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is that the nature of the crime does not be light in light of the circumstances and contents of each of the crimes in this case. Meanwhile, considering the fact that the defendants led to confession and reflect on each of the crimes in this case, the fact that the defendants A and B appear to be contingent crimes committed under the influence of alcohol, and that the defendants did not have any past record of violent crimes or fines exceeding fines, the punishment as set forth in the text of this case shall be determined.

arrow