Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Punishment of the crime

피고인들은 공모하여, 2017. 2. 4. 01:45 경 서울 관악구 D 앞길에서, 그 곳에서 피고인 B의 일행이 다른 일행과 싸움을 벌이고 있다는 112 신고를 받고 그 곳에 출동한 서울 관악 경찰서 소속의 경찰관인 경사 E, 순경 F이 더 이상 다툼이 계속되지 않도록 피고인 B을 제지한다는 이유로, 피고인 A는 경찰관 E에게 ‘ 씨 발, 뭐하는 거야 ’라고 욕설을 하면서 경찰관 E의 팔을 잡고, 손으로 몸을 밀치고, 발로 허벅지 부위를 2회 걷어 차 폭행하고, 피고인 B은 고함을 치면서 순찰차의 범퍼를 걷어찬 후, 손으로 경찰관 E의 빰을 3회, 팔을 수회 때리고, 범행현장을 촬영하려는 경찰관 F의 팔을 2회 때려 폭행하였다.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with the above police officers to interfere with their legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of order and 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ part of the legal statement [the conspiracy in which two or more persons jointly process the crime is not required under the law, and there is a combination of two or more persons to jointly process the crime and realize the crime, and even if there is no process of the whole conspiracy, if the combination of doctors is made in order or impliedly through several persons, the conspiracy is established (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2016Do6700, Aug. 18, 2016). According to each evidence of the judgment, according to each of the following evidence, the police officers sent to the scene after receiving a report of 112 at the time of the instant case and called to the scene to the scene, and tried to separate and mediate the dispute, Defendant A, who was under contact with Defendant B while trying to contact with the police officers and arrested the police officers in the act of committing the crime as a obstruction of the performance of official duties by the police officers.

At the same time, Defendant B, who was going to the patrol vehicle, was the police officer who was going to the patrol vehicle and was going to the patrol vehicle.