logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1986. 3. 11. 선고 86도56 판결
[교통사고처리특례법위반][공1986.5.1.(775),664]
Main Issues

The meaning of the case where the center line of the road on which the lane of Article 3(2) proviso of the former Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (amended by Act No. 3744 of Aug. 4, 1984) is installed is invaded.

Summary of Judgment

Article 3(2) proviso of the former Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (amended by Act No. 3744, Aug. 4, 1984) refers to the case where the center line is invaded by the center line intentionally, and the case where the center line was invaded by the center line in order to avoid an obstacle does not include the case where the center line was invaded by the center line in order to avoid an obstacle, or the place of the accident is the point beyond the center line.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 3 (2) proviso 2 of the former Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (amended by Act No. 3744 of Aug. 4, 1984)

Reference Cases

Supreme Court Decision 84Do2651 Decided March 12, 1985 85Do1407 Decided September 10, 1985

Escopics

Defendant

upper and high-ranking persons

Prosecutor

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul Criminal Court Decision 85No3464 delivered on November 14, 1985

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The prosecutor's grounds of appeal are examined.

Examining the evidence cited by the judgment of the court of first instance in comparison with the records, the evidence pointing out by the court below shall be rejected on the grounds as stated in its reasoning, and there is no evidence to acknowledge that the vehicle of the defendant was in violation of the central line of the road at the time of the accident and caused the accident, and there is no other evidence to support that the vehicle of the defendant was in violation of the rules of evidence against the theory of lawsuit.

In addition, when a person intentionally intrudes on the center line of a road where a lane under the former part of Article 3(2)2 of the former Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (amended by Act No. 3744, Aug. 4, 1984) is installed, the term "in cases where a person intentionally intrudes on the center line to drive a vehicle," and it does not include cases where a person has been forced to navigate an obstacle, or where the place of accident is beyond the center line, but does not include cases where a person is the point beyond the center line (see Supreme Court Decision 84Do2651, Mar. 12,

In theory, if the accident of this case, like sub-committees, is changed from the second line to the first line while the defendant is driving along the first line, and if the bus in the right bus stops in order to avoid this change, it cannot be deemed as a case where the central line was invaded by the central line as defined in the former part of Article 3(2)2 of the above Act. Thus, even in any case, there is no error of law in the conclusion of the court below that dismissed the prosecution.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Jeong Jong-tae (Presiding Justice)

arrow
심급 사건
- 서울형사지방법원 1985.11.14선고 85노3464

따름판례

- 대법원 1986. 9. 9. 선고 86도1142 판결 [공1986.10.15.(786),1334]

관련문헌

- 최교일 교통사고처리특례법상의 중앙선침범사고, 하 법조 42권 12호 (93.12) / 법조협회 1993

- 백현기 중앙선 침범으로 인한 교통사고 판례월보 259호 / 판례월보사 1992

- 한문철 교통사고의 형사처리에 관한 몇가지 문제점 : 판례를 중심으로 . 수원지방변호사회지 3호 / 수원지방변호사회 1991

- 하광호 교통사고처리특례법상의 문제점 사법논집 19집 / 대법원 법원행정처 1988

- 최교일 교통사고처리특례법상의 중앙선침범사고, 상 법조 42권 11호 (93.11) / 법조협회 1993

- 최승진 교통사고처리 특례법 제 3조 제 2항 단서 2호 전단(중앙선 침범사고)의 구성요건 군사법론문집 14집 / 공군본부 법무감실 1995

- 하광룡 중앙선 침범으로 인한 교통사고 국민과 사법 : 윤관 대법원장 퇴임기념 (99.01) / 박영사 1999

- 박청수 교통사고 처리특례법 제3조 제2항 단서 제2호의 중앙선 침범사고 : 판례를 중심으로 하여 형평과 정의 6집 / 대구지방변호사회 1991

- 김남현 도로교통사범과 긴급피난 경찰학연구 8호 / 경찰대학 2005

참조판례

- 대법원 1985.3.12 선고 84도2651 판결

- 1985.9.10 선고 85도1407 판결

참조조문

- 교통사고처리특례법(구) 제3조 제2항 제2호

본문참조판례

당원 1985.3.12 선고 84도2651 판결

본문참조조문

- 교통사고처리특례법 제3조 제2항 제2호

원심판결

- 서울형사지방법원 1985.11.14 선고 85노3464 판결