logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.19 2017고정1262
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, on February 9, 2017, connected to the above apartment car page (C) at the Defendant’s residence located in Gangnam-gu apartment in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, with the purpose of slandering the victim E using the above apartment car page “D.” The Defendant, written on the bulletin board, “F” with the title “F” as “F”, “F” on the bulletin board of the free location, becomes the same accomplice if he/she personally pays the remainder of the Franit Center illegally created by unlawful acts,” and all of the buyers are co-offenders.

However, Doz. Doz.

This portion has already been convicted of defamation and has already been convicted of a fine of one million won.

so far, dynasium dynasium dynasium

Ethyma Naba

“The comments posted comments on comments.”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly exposing facts through information and communications networks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. The front page of a complaint, a bulletin closure (the defendant did not have an intention to defame the defendant);

However, the defendant alleged that ① the contents of the victim's conviction, which the victim alleged, posted a statement that slanders against the defendant's husband(s) on the Internet Kafle G on the bulletin board of the above apartment occupant's Internet Kafle G, and thus, it is not a public interest issue of the above apartment resident. Furthermore, the defendant stated the result of the victim's conviction, not the author of the above article, as to the article written by the third party who differs from the defendant's opinion, ② before the victim posted the above article, the victim was prosecuted by himself beyond the wall of the first police station where the victim was born due to his husband's complaint.

Although the author prepared and posted a letter to the effect that he/she was notified of a fine or a fine, the intention that the injured person posted the above letter is to inform the husband of the cause of the fine payment.

arrow