The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who uses the clinic called “D” in the “C”, with a view to slandering the victim E, and the Defendant entered into a number of contracts at the occupants’ representative conference around July 18, 2017, including F apartment of Gyeyang-gu, Incheon, 504 and 2005, and even if the Defendant entered into a number of contracts as a proxy of the occupants’ representative conference, the damaged person entered into a multiple contract, and the fine for negligence was incurred, as it was the result of the occurrence of the damages by entering into the contract, in the notice of the above Doster in which the occupants asked the occupants.

“I see why the case of an open bid decided at the meeting of the occupants is changed from why why is the case of an administrative fine to a long-term contract, and why is the case of an open bid.”

The author openly damaged the reputation of the victim by preparing comments containing false information on the content of “”.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E, G and H;

1. Some of the protocol concerning the interrogation of the police officers against the accused;

1. Statement of the E police statement;

1. A complaint filed by E;

1. The minutes of the temporary occupants' representative meeting in January, answer to questions (related to the selection, etc. of a construction business operator due to the lack of a majority of the occupants' representative meeting), response to inquiries, apartment management rules, suspect notice contents [the defendant and the defense counsel, the defendant and the defense counsel have made a false statement of facts, and the defendant's posting of such information is for the public interest purpose of delivering accurate information about the question of the resident's questioning, and the defendant's posting of such information is without intention or defamation, and the illegality is dismissed.

The Defendant indicated “nick Audit” as a conclusive expression, namely, “a young audit”, that is, the victim was replaced by a single and multiple contracts, and the fine for negligence was incurred. According to the evidence, the Defendant’s tender was made public at the meeting of occupants on December 2016 and January 2017.