logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.08.22 2016고정1716
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)등
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a non-permanent resident of the Seoul Gwangjin-gu apartment complex.

In addition, the Defendant is a person who opens and operates the NAV “F” carpet (G) and takes the “Chairperson of Emergency Measures”.

1. No person who violates the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, etc. shall publicly indicate false facts through an information and communications network with intent to defame a person;

Nevertheless, around July 1, 2015, the Defendant sent a notice stating the title “L”, which is the victim H, I, and J (hereinafter “resident representative”) representative of the resident of the apartment of this case, by linking the resident of this case with the “L” to the Internet community camera (K; hereinafter “the next page”) in order to slander the resident of the apartment of this case, the Defendant, within the residential area of 1404, Dong 104, Dong 104, and 104, Seoul-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, hereinafter “the apartment of this case”).

The content of the above notice was that “(residents) paid KRW 2.7 billion to the land for the business site of 203 square meters (62 square meters) but (the resident representative) waived the appeal to the effect that (1/30,000,000 won) shall be limited to KRW 90,000,000,000, and the non-applicants would not be held liable for any civil and criminal liability and would have the non-applicants receive only 1/30,000,000 as the applicant for the lawsuit.” The resident representative thickness did not actively cope with the criminal trial and did not appear at all in the court.

"If these pending issues have not been resolved so far, I would like to waive the appeal without giving detailed notice to the occupants' representative thickness."

The author, as an expert, has refused to give advice by explaining several times that he/she has won a success if he/she has lodged a representative thickness.

"The decision-making so far is not objective, fair and efficient."

arrow