logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 서부지원 2018.09.18 2018고정190
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2017. 7. 16. 22:52 경 부산 사하구 C 아파트에서, 카카오톡으로 D와 대화를 하면서, 위 아파트 입주자 대표회의 회장 후보였던 피해자 E를 지칭하면서 “ 전관리 소장과 E ㆍ F ㆍ G ㆍ H 술 먹고 골프 치고 다닌 게 사실 인갑 던 데 ㅜㅜ”, “ 여자 있는 술집도 다녔다 더데” 라는 허위내용의 메시지를 전송하였다.

On July 20, 2017, the Defendant continued to ask to the occupant bulletin “C(I)” around 00:24 on the Internet NAB Kafe (C) on July 20, 2017.

As the title " ",", I think that there is no problem with the reason why part of the preliminary entrance was in possession of the warden, nife club and drinking house, and the fact that he had golf with the previous warden.

In addition, it did not ask the parties of the protocol of 105, 101, 105, 101 to the public relations list, and added a graduate school to the university's graduate and graduate school.

He could not have heard that he had been asked for certification.

I would like to know the reason why the former Director intended to do so with the Director-General’s relationship.

“The 17:28 on July 20, 2017, the 17:28 on the 2017. The 17:28 on the 2017.

“The answer was made with the false content.”

Accordingly, the defendant abused the victim's reputation by disclosing false information through information and communications networks with a view to slandering the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Each Kakao Stockholm course closure content, each Internet Kakaf bulletin board closure content, promotional materials of candidates for the chairperson of the resident representative conference, academic degree certificates, graduation certificates, and re-issuance of each card sales slip on the Internet [the defendant and the defense counsel sent the message as stated in the facts charged in this case to the defendant and sent a letter or written answers, but the purpose is to defame the defendant for the benefit of the public.

arrow