logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.07.19 2017고정197
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)등
Text

Each of the instant public prosecutions is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant, “2017 High Court 197,” in the facts charged, is a person who, by reason of his occupation, uses the “B” in the High Court NAB.

On November 3, 2016, 200:52, the Defendant’s “B” connected to the Internet, which is a trading site of secondhand goods, to the “highest and Highest country”, is not a state of progress and termination of the complaint as of November 3, 2016.

In this article, 'the victim C's ID is revealed in the notice, and 'I see that I would like to see that I would sell DNA bicycle consumptions and to see that I would like to see that I would like to know that I would like to sell them.

I have altered the author's fraud.

“Written comments” are posted on November 3, 2016, and around 22:51, 2016, “Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

I see only one column from the date of telephone recording.

Many members of the Council shall be influence of the number of members.

“The” posts a false statement of comments.

Accordingly, with the aim of slandering the defendant, the defendant up to two times posted a false fact openly through the information and communication network, thereby impairing the honor of the victim.

"2017 High 224"

A. On August 6, 2016, the Defendant’s defamation of information and communications networks changed the typical fraud in writing written comments made by the victim on the bulletin board of the country’s website, on the ground that the Defendant did not properly conduct the transaction with the victim C ( South Korea, 55 years old) at the Defendant’s residence located in Ycheon-si, Namcheon-si on August 6, 2016.

Cyber Investigative Team was accepted.

The sending of an empty stuff after the entry into the National Assembly.

I have the honor to Korea.

From August 6, 2016 to August 7, 2016, “” published false facts on the bulletin board at least 13 times, as shown in the list of crimes in attached Form (1).

Accordingly, with the aim of slandering the Defendant, the Defendant posted a false fact openly through the information and communication network, thereby impairing the honor of the victim.

B. The Defendant is insulting on August 2016.

arrow