beta
Text
Defendants are not guilty.
Reasons
1. A summary of the facts charged shall not hold a meeting of native folks society, clan gathering, alumni meeting, rally to strengthen the unity, rally to strengthen the unity, or other assemblies and meetings with the aim of influencing an election during the election period, and no person shall make, or have another person make, contributions to an election for a candidate or his/her political party, in connection with the election;
Nevertheless, on June 4, 2014, the 6th National Assembly member election of the Hado local election of the Hado local election of the Hado local election of the Hado local election of the Hado local election of the Hado local election of the Hado local election of the Hado local election of the Hado local election of the Hado local election of the Hado local election of the Hado local election of the Ha local election of the Ha
According to the above public offering, the Defendants: (a) around 19:30 on June 2, 2014 during the election period from around 19:30 to 21:10 on L 2; (b) around L 2, Defendant D opened 11 persons, including the electorate in Hsi-si, to the above restaurant; (c) Defendant A, Defendant B, and Defendant C had K carry out an election campaign, such as distributing the name cards to the participants; and (d) Defendant A calculated the food volume of KRW 252,50 of the participants after eating.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to hold a friendship meeting to influence the election during the election period, and at the same time made a contribution act of 252,50 won to 11 electorates for K who is a candidate for the election.
2. Defendants and defense counsel's assertion
A. The fact that Defendant A did not hold or conspired to hold a meeting of this case, and that he paid food was forced to pay food to Defendant A without any choice in relation to the occupation of Defendant A or to other Defendants, and that K was in the place of the meeting of this case, it does not constitute a contribution act under the Public Official Election Act.
B. Although Defendant B asked Defendant D to have a place of meals, it was irrelevant to the election, and the meeting was held by Defendant D.