logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.07.18 2014고단1808
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

The punishment of the accused shall be eight months by imprisonment.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 3, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 23:30 on the violation of the Road Traffic Act and the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) committed a motor vehicle to drive the motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol of about 3 kilometers from the front side of the Ronam apartment in the Ronam-dong, Gwangju Mine-gu to the front side of the Honam Hospital located in the same Gu, Gwangju Metropolitan City, without a motor vehicle driver’s license, while under the influence of alcohol of 0.065 percent.

2. The Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act, as if he were his resident registration number, unlawfully used another person’s resident registration number as if he were his resident registration number, in order to conceal his personal identification card from D’s situation leading up to the traffic safety department of Gwangju Mine Police Station, which carried out the duty of regulating drinking at the time and place mentioned in the foregoing paragraph (1).

3. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in the above paragraph 1, stated “E” in the column for the driver’s statement on the driver’s statement, stating “E” in the column for the driver’s signature, and affixed the Defendant’s seal on the name.

As a result, the Defendant, for the purpose of uttering, forged one copy of the report on the statement of the de facto driver, including the private document in the name of E, which is a private document concerning a certificate of fact without authority, and, as such, submitted the forged report to the above D, which knew of the forgery as if the report on the de facto driver’s statement was genuine.

4. The Defendant, at the time, at the place, and at the time, and at the place specified in the above paragraph (1), discovered the suspicion of drunk driving, had the Defendant act as E, and had the said D enter the personal information of E and the fact of drunk driving in the notification of the results of the drinking driving control by accessing the Transport and Police Computer Network in PDA, and then forged the above E’s signature, a private signature, for the purpose of exercising the electronic signature in the driver’s signature column.

arrow