logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.04.23 2019고단2621
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 05:54 on February 17, 2019, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (Driving without a license) and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) driving a DK5 car under the influence of alcohol of about 0.095% without obtaining a driving license from the Do in front of Gyeyang-gu Incheon Gyeyang-gu, Incheon to the end of about 138 ambi-gu, Bupyeong-gu, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, to the end of 138 ambi-gu, Bupyeong-gu.

2. On February 17, 2019, at around 05:54, the Defendant: (a) controlled a drunk driving in front of the 138 Busan Bupyeong-gu vice-gu, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon on February 17, 2019; (b) notified the Defendant of the Defendant’s name and resident registration number to the traffic control police officer; (c) notified the Defendant of the Defendant’s name and resident registration number; and (d) sent the Defendant a notice of the results of the drinking driving control, which is a public electronic record, to enter the said E’s personal information and the details of the violation of drinking driving; and (d) made the Defendant sign “E” by presenting the PDA to enter the driver’s signature.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of interfering with administrative affairs, forged a notice of the results of drinking driving control in the electronic traffic police computer network, which is an electronic record of a public office, and exercised a small-scale public electronic record by allowing the above F to transmit it to the traffic police computer network.

3. The Defendant, at the time, place, and place specified in Paragraph 2, forged a private signature by stating “E” without authority in order to exercise his/her signature on the report on the statement of his/her situation of his/her driver, in which personal information was recorded by the police officer F, according to the Defendant’s false statement from the police officer F, and then issued the document stating the forged private signature to F as if it were genuine.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Report on the situation of driving under the influence of alcohol, report on the control of driving under the influence of alcohol, and report on the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver;

arrow