beta
Text
1. The judgment of the first instance, including a claim for additional reduction at the appellate court, shall be modified as follows:
Defendant.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The parties are educational foundations that establish and operate a D University and E University.
Plaintiff
A on March 1, 1996, as a construction engineering and full-time lecturer at D University, and as a plaintiff F and full-time lecturer at D University on March 1, 198, respectively, were appointed as an associate professor and appointed on March 1, 198.
B. On January 9, 2014, the president of the Defendant’s respective removal from office requested a resolution against the Plaintiffs to the Committee for Disciplinary Measures against D University Teachers on December 2, 2013. Accordingly, on December 30, 2013, the Committee for Disciplinary Measures against the Plaintiffs on the ground that the Plaintiffs were subject to the following disciplinary measures, and accordingly, on January 9, 2014, the Defendant issued the respective removal from office (hereinafter “the primary removal”).
1. On August 23, 2013, Plaintiff A presented the opinion of the principal related to teaching assistants under the title of “public letter sent with a thickness of grather,” and argued that there was no urgent supplementary supplement to the effect that one in the construction field and one professor in the structural field should be recruited at the time of teaching assistants.
Therefore, although the principal of the school affairs knows the intention of writing, he/she rejected the direction by stating that he/she may not be allowed until he/she becomes a professor, although he/she is aware of the intention of writing, he/she is going to go up with a student's comments, so he/she may not go up until he/she becomes a professor.
(C) On September 24, 2013, the Korean government confirmed that the D University, a department store of private school, will be comprehensively audited and that the public nature and transparency of private universities will be established.
In light of the phrase of the visit, a member of the D University was far beyond the scope of publication on the job, and was engaged in an act of slandering against the D University that could not be able to accommodate the D University.
A shall conduct a comprehensive audit of the D University without clear evidence, and shall also conduct a comprehensive audit of the D University, which is a global merchant of private school in the D University.