logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2016.02.04 2015구합60327
교원소청심사위원회결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including costs incurred by participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

On September 1, 1994, the Plaintiff was newly appointed as a music university artist and a full-time lecturer at C University operated by the Intervenor (hereinafter referred to as the “C University”), and was promoted as a full-time professor on September 1, 2005, and was employed as a artist from February 2012 to December 2014.

On October 13, 2014, the intervenor requested the Teachers' Disciplinary Committee for a disciplinary resolution against the plaintiff, and on October 15, 2014, the intervenor removed the plaintiff from office.

(hereinafter “instant removal from position”). On December 9, 2014, the Cth Disciplinary Committee decided on the Plaintiff’s disciplinary action against the removal from position as follows; accordingly, the Intervenor took disciplinary action against the Plaintiff on December 11, 2014.

(이하 ‘이 사건 파면처분’이라 하고, 이 사건 직위해제처분과 합쳐 ‘이 사건 처분’이라 한다). ▣ 징계사유(이하 ‘이 사건 징계사유’라 하고, 순번으로 특정한다)

1. The Plaintiff, from September 2012 to June 2014, purchased unjust profits by selling off the strings and the strings and the strings to be distributed free of charge from around September 2012 to around June 2014, and misappropriated the sales proceeds.

2. The Plaintiff, even though receiving subsidies from C to cover expenses incurred in performing literary activities and seminars, he/she obtained unjust profits by walking KRW 3,390,000 per person on the pretext of seminars from students on March 2013.

3. The Plaintiff, who was in an unfaithfuld lecture, proceeded with only twice in the valley for the first semester on January 2014 in his/her charge, reduced the hours of study in his/her major class, and proceeded with the lectures in an unfaithful manner, such as having other professors attend the class in his/her responsibility and evaluate them.

4. The Plaintiff’s forced to conduct unfair sexual evaluation on November 2012, 2012: (a) the examination of graduates from the school; (b) the first and second semesters; (c) the first semester in 2014; (d) the first semester in December 2012; and (e) the seasonal major instruments in December 2012, 2013.

arrow