1. The Defendant’s reprimand issued against the Plaintiffs on July 21, 2016 and the amount of KRW 31 million against the Plaintiff on August 3, 2016, and the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. Plaintiff A was appointed as a full-time lecturer at D University on March 1, 1992 and served as science education and professor from September 1, 2005 to September 1, 2005. Plaintiff B was appointed as a full-time lecturer at D University on March 1, 2003 and served as science education and professor from April 1, 2014 until then, Plaintiff C was appointed as a full-time lecturer at D University on August 22, 2007, and then is serving as science education and associate professor from October 1, 2012 to now.

B. From December 9, 2015 to December 18, 2015, the Minister of Education conducted a comprehensive audit with respect to D University. From March 29, 2012 to March 2016, 2016, eight professors, including the Plaintiffs, who performed a research project within 20 teaching subjects, including E, submitted a master’s degree thesis (the first author’s professor and the second author’s leader) published in the faculty conference as a result of the study and received support of KRW 1.5 million in total, which is hereinafter referred to as “research ethics regulation for D University Research Ethics”.

) Article 2(1)3(Section) and 4(unfair thesis author’s indication is subject to disciplinary action against the relevant professor as it constitutes a violation of the guidelines for management of research expenses of D University, and corrective order was issued to collect KRW 15 million for research expenses already paid in accordance with guidelines for management of research expenses of D University and to take measures for revenue revenue in the relevant accounts.

C. On April 25, 2016, the Defendant applied for a retrial seeking revocation with respect to six professors, including the Plaintiffs, among the above orders issued by the Minister of Education in the Minister of Education. The Minister of Education, around July 2016, revoked both minor disciplinary action and recovery of research expenses for the Defendant, F (L) and G (English education and professor) and revoked part of H (computer education and professor) in the disposition of recovery of research expenses, and dismissed all applications for reexamination with respect to the Plaintiffs.

The Defendant, on July 8, 2016, issued the General Disciplinary Committee on D University Public Educational Officials (hereinafter “General Disciplinary Committee”) with the grounds set forth below.