logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.09.07 2016고단4728
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant had a complaint against the real estate owner who arranged the Defendant’s house contract on the ground that he had a fung fung fung fung fung fung fung fung fung fung fung fung fung fung fung fung fung fung fung.

Around 17:00 on July 16, 2016, the Defendant entered the “E” operated by the victim D in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, and found the owner of the above real estate. However, the Defendant confirmed that the owner of the above real estate did not have any satisfaction and reported it to the victim as fraud by stating that “the owner of the real estate was concealed, the owner of the real estate was called as an internal taxable disposition, and the victim reported it to the victim as a fraud.” The Defendant requested the victim and other customers in his/her place of business to leave the place of business on the ground that the business of the Defendant was obstructed, but the Defendant did not respond to the request until the police officer dispatched upon receipt of the report arrives, and did not leave the place of business without complying with the request for about 10 minutes until the police officer arrive.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's business by force, and the need to leave from the victim.

The Gu did not comply with the Gu.

2. The Defendant, upon receipt of a report on the date and time, at the place, and the date and time specified in paragraph (1), and the victim patrolmen of the Incheon Western Police Station, asked the Defendant about the circumstances, etc. of the case by asking the case to the victim, who is the victim G and the victim patrolmen of the Incheon Western Police Station about the background of the case, and made a public insult of the victims by referring to the victim “I are the police officer, if you are the police officer. I see the last one how I are in the inner part, and whether I are being able to go with this sp

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of G and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of D;

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of punishment.

arrow