Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendant in response to the withdrawal is the victim B’s relation.
From July 9, 2020, the Defendant drinked with the victim’s house located in Gangwon-gun C, D, while drinking with the victim at the victim’s house at his own expense on July 10, 2020. On July 10, 2020, the Defendant refused it, and the victim refused it, she took a bath to the victim, and avoided the disturbance.
After July 10, 2020, the Defendant received a request from a police officer to move back from the victim's house on several occasions on July 10, 2020, and fails to comply with the request from the victim, thereby leaving the victim out without justifiable grounds.
The Gu refused to comply with the Gu.
2. The Defendant who destroyed and damaged special property shall leave the victim B, such as the date and place described in the preceding paragraph.
The cell phone, which is a dangerous object that does not comply with the Gu and was cited by the hand, has lowered the cremation room which is owned by the victim, and damaged the glass of 15,00 won in the market price.
3. The defendant, at around 02:35 on July 10, 2020, leaves B as described in the preceding paragraph at the place where the defendant had been engaged in obstruction of performance of official duties.
In response to the failure of the Gu, and the removal from F and G was caused by the damage of B’s toilet glass, the police officers as follows: “I can see who see the inside, regardless of who she want to live.” The police officers were threatened by the police officers as follows: (a) there are many money; (b) there is a large amount of money; and (c) the b) the b) the b) the b) the b) the b) the b) the b) the b) the b) the b) the b) the b) the b) the b (the b) the b) the b) the b (the b) the b) the b) the b) the b (the b) the b) the b) the b) the b) the
Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the police officers' legitimate performance of official duties concerning the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each police statement made to B, F, and G;
1. Each field photograph, 112 Handling table of reported cases, recording records, and other Acts and subordinate statutes;