logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.09.29 2016고단1468
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for one year and eight months, and for six months, for each of the defendants C.

(b).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. An employer who operates a child-care center in violation of the Act on the Management of Fraud and Subsidy may outsource the training expenses to another training institution and require the relevant training institution (entrusted training institution) to conduct workplace skill development training for the child-care teacher, and where the child-care teacher has completed the training, the employer may receive subsidies from the Minister of Labor. In order to receive such subsidies, the employer shall enter into an agreement with the training institution certified by the Human Resources Development Service of Korea for entrustment of workplace skill development training for the workplace-care teacher, and shall actually pay the training expenses to the entrusted training institution; and in cases of an aggregate of the training courses for which the person subject to the education directly receives the education from the entrusted training institution, the child-care teacher shall attend at least 80/100 of the training hours recognized by the relevant training institution and complete the relevant training course;

Defendant

B From November 201 to December 2012, 201, the government of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the child of the child of the child of the child of the child of the child of the child of the child of the workplace of the workplace of the employer who was commissioned the workplace of the child of the child of the child of the child of the workplace of the workplace of the workplace of the employer of the child of the child of the child of the child of the child of the workplace, and the employer of the I corporation was operating the I corporation of the educational institution which received training fees from the

When the Defendants (Defendant A along with L) become aware of the fact that the head of the child care center who is a business owner can receive the cost of workplace skill development training from the Ministry of Labor, they can receive the cost of workplace skill development training from the head of the child care center.

arrow