logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.01.12 2016고단7573
사서명위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 25, 2016, at around 09:10 on September 25, 2016, the Defendant: (a) expressed that the victim C (here, 59 years of age) who is a business owner in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City was in the drinking value; and (b) expressed that “years and bad years of age” was “for the victim; and (c) assaulted with the victim’s hand floor by two times the victim’s left side buck.

2. On September 25, 2016, the Defendant, who violated the Resident Registration Act, was arrested in a flagrant offender on the same day as described in paragraph 1, and transferred the same to Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwanak-ro D on September 25, 2016.

The Defendant received a request from the police officer E belonging to the above police station to inform him of his name and resident registration number, and used the F resident registration number (G) in a manner that the Defendant took place as if he was F, and did not use the F resident registration number.

3. The Defendant, at the same time and place as indicated in paragraph 2, committed as if he were F, and was investigated by the police officer, and entered “F” in the column of “a person who made a statement at the end of the suspect interrogation protocol after having been faced with the investigation of the suspect by the police officer.

Accordingly, the defendant has forged F's signature without authority for the purpose of exercising his authority.

4. The Defendant, at the time and place indicated in paragraph (3), submitted the above suspect interrogation protocol to the police officer who is aware of the fact that the signature of F, which was recorded in the suspect interrogation protocol, was authentic, and exercised the forged signature.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (as to the remainder of the crime except the point of assault);

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. A written statement prepared by C;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect under the name of the F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each investigation report;

1. Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and Article 260(1) of the choice of punishment (a) of the Criminal Act, Article 37 Subparag. 10 of the Resident Registration Act (an illegal use of another person’s resident registration number, a type of imprisonment, a choice of punishment), Article 239(1) of the Criminal Act (a) and Article 239(2) of the Criminal Act.

arrow