2016Nu69354 Demanding revocation of the designation of a Chinese travelman.

A

The Minister of Culture, Sports and Tourism

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2016Guhap59010 decided October 6, 2016

December 20, 2016

January 10, 2017

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The revocation of the designation of the travel agency exclusively in charge of attracting Chinese organizations tourists against the plaintiff on March 28, 2016 shall be revoked.

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning for the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: "The first disposition on No. 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be based on the law, which imposes a significant restriction on the freedom of occupation and the freedom of business of the people," and "No. 15 of the judgment of the court of first instance" (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 2016Du37560, Jul. 27, 2016; 2015Nu6730, Apr. 5, 2016)" is the same as the entry of the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding "the Supreme Court Decisions 201Du37560, Jul. 27, 2016; see, e.g., Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

The presiding judge, the highest judge

Judges fixed-term machines

Judges Cho Yong-chul