(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.5.18.선고 2016누66553 판결

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The defendant's disposition of revocation of the designation of the Chinese exclusive travelr against the plaintiff on March 28, 2016 and the plaintiff shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning of the judgment of this court is as follows, except for the dismissal or addition of some contents as follows, and thus, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of

○, on the 6th page 10, "2015HunBa125" added ", 290" to the following:

○ Part 9, Chapter 18, the following marks are put in order:

A person shall be appointed.

Part 10, Section 18, ".. sent" added "at the time of the disposition of this case, the following evaluation criteria for the renewal system (hereinafter referred to as "evaluation criteria for renewal in 2015") was applied", and thereafter added the following table.

A person shall be appointed.

○○, No. 13, No. 5, “The plaintiff submitted an additional certificate of No. 13, No. 16 in the trial by asserting that he actively engaged in the business to attract Chinese collective tourists. However, since it is apparent that the evaluation score of the plaintiff, which has been sold by reflecting Chinese collective tourism attraction performance, falls short of the standard score, the plaintiff’s assertion in this part is without merit.”

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.