Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.
If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On September 30, 2013, at around 04:00, the Defendant driven B vehicles under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.132% at a section of about 5km from the front side of the guest history culture center in Gyeyang-gu, Nanyang-gu, Nanyang-gun without a driver’s license, to the front side of the guest history culture center in the front side of the same Eup/Myeon, and the front side of the early street of the same Eup
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;
1. Statement on the circumstances of the driver, report on the detection of the driver, and report on the driver;
1. Registers of driver's licenses;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of report on internal accidents (Application of Madmark);
1. Article 148-2 (2) 2, Article 44 (1), subparagraph 1 of Article 152, and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;
1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on October 16, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment for the crime of larceny and violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) at the 15th Military Military Court of the 15th Military Service on October 24, 2012, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 24, 2012, despite the fact that he/she is currently under suspended sentence, so it is highly likely to be subject to criticism.
However, the Defendant, other than the above previous conviction and the instant crime, has no record of being punished for drinking and driving without obtaining a license, and since the completion of military service, has not yet passed, and thus, the Defendant committed the instant crime, even though he committed the instant crime, he was in depth and is sentenced to a fine only once, taking into account the fact that he committed the instant crime, and the Defendant’s age, etc., is sentenced to a fine