logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.01.30 2014고단2594
아동복지법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A shall be the head of the F Child Care Center in Namyang-si E on January 30, 2015, while Defendant B shall be the head of the F Child Care Center.

1. At around 10:09 on February 19, 2014, Defendant A committed emotional abuse that may harm the mental health and development of a child by taking the victim into the seat of the victim G (three years of age) one time in his/her hand, and by taking the victim into the seat of the victim, on the ground that he/she did not hear his/her horse despite the dispute over the child’s kids, while leaving the child at the above FF childcare center.

2. On January 22, 2014, Defendant B committed emotional abuse that may harm the mental health and development of a child by making the head of the Victim H(four years of age) who is a child rapidly low chlodden punter one time, on the ground that the child does not listen to the horse in the process of preparation for balone:06 at the above F F Child Care Center.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Defendant B’s partial statement

1. Investigative report (ctv image attachment);

1. Each complaint;

1. Requests for cooperation in investigation affairs;

1. Written accusation, etc.;

1. Photographs [Defendant B and his defense counsel argued that the defendant's act when the defendant's head of the victimized child by the cellphone block " does not constitute "the emotional abusive acts that harm the mental health and development of the victimized child" under Article 17 subparagraph 5 of the Child Welfare Act, but the defendant's head part of the victimized child's head merely 28 months using the goods in a considerable century constitutes emotional abusive acts that harm the mental health and development of the victimized child (the defendant B and his defense counsel asserted to the effect that the crime in this case was a legitimate act committed at the education level for the victimized child, but considering the circumstance, degree and degree of the assault, and age of the victimized child, the crime in this case cannot be viewed as a legitimate act that does not violate social rules.

[1] Application of the law

arrow