1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. D and E entered into a contract with F on September 10, 2006 with respect to construction of new multi-household housing, etc. on the fifth parcel of land, including Daejeon Seo-gu G, Daejeon.

나. 위 건축주들로부터 위 신축공사 및 분양 등에 관한 일체의 권한을 위임받은 F은 2007. 3.경 주식회사 비젼아이엔씨(이하 ‘비젼아이엔씨’라 한다)와 위 신축공사 중 창호, 샷시 등 공사 부분에 관하여 공사대금 8,500만 원, 공사기간 2007. 4. 7.부터 2007. 4. 25.까지로 하는 공사하도급계약을 체결하였다.

다. 그 후 비젼아이엔씨는 위 하도급계약에 따른 창호, 샷시 등 공사 부분을 완공함과 아울러, 1,500만 원 상당의 추가공사를 시행하였으나, F으로부터 공사대금 합계 1억 원 중 1,500만 원만을 지급받았을 뿐 나머지 8,500만 원은 지급받지 못하였다

(hereinafter referred to as “instant construction cost claim”). D.

On July 16, 2008, the Plaintiff received a successful bid for the real estate auction procedure and completed the registration of ownership transfer on the instant real estate in the name of the Plaintiff on January 8, 2010.

E. The Defendant occupied and used the instant real estate since October 18, 2007 as the right of retention on the instant claim for construction price upon request by the head who is the representative director of the non-Hungary, and was in possession and use of the instant real estate since October 18, 207. On January 2008, the Defendant acquired the instant claim for construction price from non-Hungary, and as of the date of closing argument of the instant case, possessed the instant real estate as of the date of closing argument.

F. Meanwhile, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant with Daejeon District Court 2010Kadan27349 and rendered a favorable judgment on February 18, 2011, but the Defendant appealed with the Daejeon District Court 201Na5408 and filed an appeal with the Daejeon District Court 201Na5408, and the said appellate court around September 7, 201 and around January 2010.