Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants purchased a multi-household house in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and conspired to obtain a loan of KRW 84 million from a financial institution, despite the fact that the total amount of lease deposit of lessees residing in the above multi-household house is KRW 228 million, the Defendants falsely prepared a real estate lease agreement with the total amount of deposit deposit of KRW 16.5 million.

Accordingly, on September 27, 2012, the Defendants entered the name E, resident registration number F, and the name G, resident registration number H in the lessor column, and affixed the seal of the E, which Defendant A newly affixed to the name of the above E, on the column of the real estate location of the site for the real estate lease agreement. Defendant B, on September 27, 2012, stated in the column of the real estate location of the site for the real estate lease agreement, “Seoul City, Seogu, Do, D 101, and KRW 300,000 in the deposit column, “30,000,000 won in the monthly rent column,” and in the lessor column, “name E, resident registration number: F,” and in the lessee column, read “H: name G, resident registration number: H,” followed the name of the above E, and affixed the seal affixed by Defendant A on the name of the above G.

As a result, the Defendants forged one chapter of the lease contract in the name of E and G, a private document on rights and obligations without authority for the purpose of exercising their rights.

In addition, on September 27, 2012, the Defendants provided six copies of the real estate lease agreement (person in the title of preparation, 12), such as the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.

2. On September 28, 2012, the Defendants at the event of the said investigation document submitted to the victim’s agricultural cooperative name and exercised the said investigation document as if it was a document duly formed with the conclusion of the real estate lease agreement under the name of E and G, which was forged at the “the store of the agricultural merchant of the Nong-gu, Daegu-gu. Agricultural Cooperative” located in 191 on September 28, 2012.

In addition, on September 28, 2012, the Defendants suffered six copies of the forged real estate lease agreement (in the name of 12 persons preparing), such as the written list of crimes, by the same method as in the attached list of crimes.