logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2015. 11. 12. 선고 2015다226571 판결
(심리불속행)제척기간이 경과하고 사해행위일 5년 후 부과처분은 고도의 개연성 없음.[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Busan High Court 2014Na52605

Title

(C) The exclusion period has expired and the imposition of tax after five years from the date of the fraudulent act is highly probable.

Summary

(2) According to the existing practice of the summary, the tax imposed on the entertainment room has been paid, the exclusion period (5 years) has passed, and the disposition imposed five years after the date of the fraudulent act is highly probable.

Related statutes

Article 30 of the National Tax Collection Act

Cases

Supreme Court Decision 2015Da226571 Revocation of Fraudulent Act

Plaintiff-Appellant

Korea

Defendant-Appellee

LAA

Judgment of the lower court

Busan High Court 2014Na52605

Imposition of Judgment

November 12, 2015

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant constitutes Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

arrow