logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2019. 01. 17. 선고 2018두56695 판결
(심리불속행) 세목과 과세기간을 달리한다면 특례부과제척기간을 적용할 수 없음[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2018-Nu-37191 (Law No. 24, 2018)

Title

If the tax items and taxable periods are different, the exclusion period for special taxation shall not apply.

Summary

(2) The exclusion period for special exclusion is not applicable if the items of taxation revoked by the preceding judgment and the period of taxation are different from those of the subsequent disposition.

Related statutes

The exclusion period of national tax imposition under Article 26-2 of the Framework Act on National Taxes

Cases

2018Du5695. Invalidity of a disposition imposing capital gains tax (including additional tax)

Plaintiff-Appellant

O

Defendant-Appellee

O Head of tax office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2018Nu37191 Decided August 24, 2018

Imposition of Judgment

January 17, 2019

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

Examining the lower judgment and the grounds of appeal, the grounds of appeal by appellant are not included in the grounds of appeal under each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Procedure for Appeal, or are deemed to fall under each subparagraph of paragraph (3). Therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition

arrow