beta
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Daejeon High Court (Cheongju) 2018Nu1511, 20197.03
Title
(Recompetence of Trial) A criminal judgment that has already been established on the same factual basis in an administrative trial becomes a flexible evidence.
Summary
(2) The court below's decision on the same facts in the administrative trial is justified. The court below's decision on the same facts is without merit. The court below's decision on the grounds of appeal is without merit. The court below's decision on the grounds of appeal is without merit.
Related statutes
The exclusion period for national tax assessment under Article 26-2 of the Framework Act on National Taxes paid under Article 17 of the former Value-Added
Cases
2019Du46688. Revocation of a disposition imposing value-added tax;
Plaintiff-Appellant
○○○ Incorporated Company
Defendant-Appellee
○ Head of tax office
Judgment of the lower court
Daejeon High Court (Cheongju) 2018Nu1511, 20197.03
Imposition of Judgment
November 14, 2019
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.
Reasons
Examining the judgment below and the grounds of appeal, since it is apparent that the appellant’s ground of appeal falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.