logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.01.20 2014나35203
구상금 등 청구의 소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: "the above credit guarantee agreement" in the last 2th of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed to be "the credit guarantee agreement of this case"; "the above credit guarantee agreement of the third 13" in the third 15 shall be deemed to be "the credit guarantee agreement of this case"; "the above credit guarantee agreement of the 16th 17th 17th 17th 4th 4th 4th 4th "the above credit guarantee agreement of this case" shall be deemed to be "the credit guarantee agreement of this case"; "the above credit guarantee agreement of the 17th 4th 4th 4th 2th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th "the above credit guarantee agreement of this case" shall be deemed to be "the credit guarantee agreement of this case"; "the above credit guarantee fee of the first 17th 17th 1th 5th 1th 5th 25 20 20 and 5th 5th 5th 7th 2.".

[Supplementary measures against the defendant's assertion that the defendant is a bona fide beneficiary. However, the circumstance that the defendant continuously supplied goods to A and received a bill for issuance of A is insufficient to recognize the defendant as a bona fide beneficiary, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it as a bona fide beneficiary. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

arrow