1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3.Paragraph 1 of the text of the judgment of the court of first instance.

1. The reasons for the court’s explanation concerning this case are as follows: “Defendant B” stated in the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance as “Codefendant B of the court of first instance,” “Defendant C,” and “Defendant C,” respectively, was commenced as “the second page of the judgment of the court of first instance,” and “after that, upon the request of the Korea Housing Finance Corporation for auction on real estate by the Korea Housing Finance Corporation, a company entrusted with the business of the above apartment, the company entrusted with the business of the Korea Housing Finance Corporation, a company entrusted with the business of the Korea Housing Finance Corporation, established the procedure of double auction on July 11, 2013,” and “in the fifth page,” and “in the fifth page, the above court of first instance,” and “in the fifth page, the Defendant suffered from Albnick-type disease and seems not to know the conclusion of the lease contract of this case, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.”

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. However, it is obvious that "D" in Paragraph 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance is a clerical error in D and J (Dual). Thus, it is so decided as per Disposition.