The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the gist of the Defendant’s appeal grounds (unfair sentencing) against the Defendant’s mistake, and the fact that there exists no record of criminal punishment except for a judgment of suspended sentence due to special larceny, etc., relatively old, and efforts to recover damage, etc., the lower court’s sentence ordering the Defendant to complete the program of treating sexual assault for a period of 1 year, 6 months and 40 hours is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case was committed by receiving three video files in which the Defendant was exposed to the victim’s self-defense by using the “F Bade,” etc. operated by the Defendant, thereby threatening the victim as if he were to spread the above video files to many and unspecified persons. The Defendant’s “I” bulletin board provides three video files available to the public so that 7 people can download the F Doz. The Doz bulletin board of “M” and the Internet website bulletin board may spread the Doz bulletin board of this case and the video and photographs taken by ordinary adults with sexual intercourses over 57 times in total, so that the Doz bulletin board of this case and the Internet site Q Doz are exposed to sexual character and behavior, and that the Defendant’s obscenity was not exposed to the Defendant’s emotional character and behavior before and after the Defendant’s use of the Internet Doz, and that the Defendant did not have any 9 juvenile pornography’s sexual character and behavior, including the video Doz. The Defendant appeared to have taken up the Defendant’s sexual character and behavior of the Defendant’s.