All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (two months of imprisonment, additional collection of 94,580,000 won) is too heavy or too low (the Defendant).

2. However, under the favorable circumstances such as the confession of the crime of this case and the fact that the defendant himself surrenderss to the investigative agency, the acts of arranging sexual traffic do not have a significant social hazard, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, and preventing the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments, and establishing a sound sexual culture, it is necessary to cut off and severe punishment against the owner of the business who operates illegal sexual traffic establishments. The defendant has been operating sexual traffic establishments equipped with smuggling in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City for a considerable period of time to obtain criminal profits. Furthermore, when the above businesses were controlled to get police investigation, the defendant has been urged by J and K to make a false statement at the investigative agency as the actual owner of the business, and the defendant has already been sentenced to punishment for a prolonged period of time under the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. of Sexual Traffic, which is against the law of Incheon District Court on February 18, 2009, the court below sentenced the defendant's punishment for the crime of this case to the punishment of this case.

3. If so, the defendant and the prosecutor's appeal against the judgment of the court below are without merit. Thus, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.