All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (two months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, confiscation and surcharge 4950,00 won) is too heavy (the Defendant) or too unhued, and it is unreasonable to conduct an inspection.

2. On the other hand, the acts of arranging sexual traffic do not have considerable social harm, such as the confession of the Defendant to commit the instant crime and the fact that the Defendant has the time to reflect the instant crime through confinement life for about two months, the acts of arranging sexual traffic do not have any record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine, and on the other hand, it is necessary to cut off and punish the proprietor operating illegal sexual traffic establishments even in order to prevent the spread of women's sex and to establish a sound sexual culture, and even if it is necessary to do so, it is necessary to repeat the instant crime without being aware of the fact that the Defendant has been under control of the crime similar to the act of violating the Juvenile Protection Act and the Employment Security Act committed at the same place, other unfavorable circumstances such as the method of the instant crime, the period of the crime, the size of profits acquired by the Defendant from the crime, the age, home environment of the Defendant, and the circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the punishment imposed by the court below is adequate and too harsh.

3. If so, the defendant and the prosecutor's appeal against the judgment of the court below are without merit. Thus, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.