The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (7 million won of a fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Although the defendant is led to the crime of this case, the act of arranging sexual traffic does not have a significant social hazard, such as the commercialization of women's sex and undermining the sound sexual culture and good morals, and the act of arranging sexual traffic is in need of a simple and strict punishment as to the owner of the business that operates illegal sexual traffic establishments even in order to prevent the spread of the illegal sexual traffic establishments and to establish a sound sexual culture. In particular, the defendant is engaged in the act of arranging sexual traffic closely in the name of "C" in the vicinity of an elementary school, and the nature of the crime is poor, and the various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments such as the defendant's age, happy family environment, conditions before and after the crime are taken into account, it cannot be deemed that the sentence against the defendant is too unreasonable.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.