A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

B. On September 5, 2014, the Defendant lodged an appeal against the Defendant, who was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the District Court of Jung-gu on September 5, 2014. On January 9, 2015, the appellate court reversed the judgment of the first instance, and sentenced the Defendant to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and nine months, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on January 12, 2015.

"2014 Highest 4625"

1. On February 12, 2014, the Defendant: (a) discovered a mobile phone sales store “E” operated by D in Scheon-si C with F identification cards; and (b) made it possible for F to open a mobile phone in the name of F by advertising the phone sales store in F.

The Defendant: (a) entered the customer information on the application for the subscription of the SKS mobile phone service in the name of “F”, “G”, “G”, “Gu residents’ address”, “Guide Hambro*******); (b) signed it, “F”, and “F”, while purchasing Aphone 5S smartphones; and (c) signed the franchise sales contract for the terminal operation, the Defendant arbitrarily entered the F’s personal information and signed it.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged the application form for mobile telephone subscription in the name of F, which is a private document on rights and obligations, and one copy of the contract form for terminal use.

2. The Defendant, while opening a Handphone at the above date, at the above place, delivered a forged application form for opening a mobile phone and a sales contract for the terminal to D who is unaware of the circumstances, and exercised it as if they were duly formed.

3. The Defendant, at the above date and at the above place, issued a forged mobile phone subscription application and a sales contract for the terminal, and, upon presenting F’s identification card, enticed the victim D as if he/she had a legitimate authority to open a telephone in his/her own name and in F’s name.

The Defendant received from the victim one of the smartphones with an amount equivalent to KRW 814,00,00 at the market price of 814,00,00 from the victim.

The defendant of "2015 Highest 257".