Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and B conspired to open the cell phone in the name of C with the fact that C, the birth of the defendant, is between the military forces.

1. Around July 12, 2010, the Defendant and B of the use of a private document forgery and the display of a private document are as follows: (a) two copies of the service application contract and two copies of the contract form for the use of the device; (b) two copies of the service application contract in the name of C, a private document concerning rights and obligations, and two copies of the contract form for the use of the device, signed and signed on the applicant customer column; and (c) forged two copies of the contract form for the use of the device, which are private documents related to rights and obligations, and were delivered to E without knowledge of such circumstances.

In addition, on July 13, 2010, the Defendant and B entered the personal information of each C in two copies of the service application contract and two copies of the terminal installment contract, and forged two copies of the service application contract in the name of C, which is a private document concerning rights and duties, and two copies of the contract for the service contract in the name of C, which is a private document concerning rights and duties, for the purpose of using the name of each C and signing it in the customer column, and exercised it by delivering it to E without knowledge of the circumstances.

2. On July 12, 2010, the Defendant and B acquired two mobile phones from the victim E by using a forged service application contract and a sales contract for terminal installation as described in the foregoing paragraph (1). On July 13, 2010 following the following day, the Defendant and B acquired two mobile phones from the victim E by exercising a forged service application contract and a sales contract for terminal installation, as described in the foregoing paragraph (1). In short, the Defendant and B did not pay a total of KRW 5,919,150 for each machine price and mobile phone use fee, and did not pay a total of KRW 5,919,150 for each mobile phone use fee.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each statement made by the defendant and B in the police interrogation protocol (No. 3 of the evidence list) against the defendant;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A family relation certificate, four copies of a new service contract, and the application of statutes;

1. Relevant provisions concerning facts constituting an offense;