logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2012.07.05 2011고단1539
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around October 2010, the Defendant offered a proposal to offer money in lieu of a mobile phone in the name of a third party from C on the name of the Defendant, and agreed to open the mobile phone on behalf of the Defendant who is the relative of the owner of the mobile phone who will open the mobile phone by entering the mobile phone agency and acting on behalf of the owner of the mobile phone to open the mobile phone. A false name C conspired to open the mobile phone in the name of the mobile phone by forging the identification card of the owner of the mobile phone who will open the mobile phone to the agency office by facsimile, and by pretending that it is the owner of the mobile phone who will open the mobile phone by telephone, the Defendant conspired to open the mobile phone in the name of another person.

1. On October 22, 2010, the Defendant: (a) in collusion with the Defendant on his name omitted C; (b) on the Felcom operated by E located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 105, the Defendant opened two mobile phones (H and I) under the name of G, pretending to be G, as he was G, despite that the Defendant was not a kyna of G; (c) on two copies of the new contract form for the mobile phone service located therein and two copies of the contract form for the mobile phone service; and (d) on two copies of the contract form for the mobile phone service and the contract form for the part of the terminal, the Defendant entered “G”, “J”, “G”, and “G” in the customer information column; and (d) on the name omitted C, the Defendant sent the Plaintiff’s resident registration form by facsimile.

As a result, the Defendant forged two copies of a new contract for mobile phone service in the name of G, which is a private document on rights and duties without authority, and two copies of a contract for mobile phone service in the name of G with the intention of exercising the right and duties in collusion.

2. The Defendant in collusion with C in the name of the above investigation document, and at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1, submitted a new contract for the mobile phone service and a contract for the terminal service to K, who is an employee in charge of the charge of the charge of the charge of the charge of the charge of the charge of the charge of the charge of the charge of the

3. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, shall be the victim E’s telecom.

arrow