A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

While the Defendant was working as an employee at the “D agency,” which is a mobile phone sales agency operated by the victim C, the Defendant forged documents as if each nominal owner purchases a mobile phone, and acquired money from the victim through the sale of a mobile phone, etc., using the list of customers managed by the said mobile phone sales agency. The monthly fee and the mobile phone payment of the said mobile phone were made by using the document as if he/she purchased the mobile phone, so that the nominal owner who used the name by paying for the said mobile phone is aware of the opening of the mobile phone in his/her own name, and was willing to open the mobile phone by taking advantage of the name of the above victim as if he/she opened the mobile

1. On January 9, 2012, the Defendant forged private documents, using the personal information of the customer F managed by the said agency in “D agency” operated by the victim C, the Defendant: (a) prepared a sales contract for terminal devices; (b) an application for the change of the device/USIM; and (c) written confirmation of the subscription of LTE discount; and (d) written “F” in the name of the nominal owner of each document; and (c) signed the document after name.

Accordingly, the Defendant, for the purpose of uttering, forged documents related to the opening of a mobile phone by stealing 102 persons on a total of 102 occasions from March 8, 2013, including a sales and purchase contract for a device, a device/USIM change application, and a LET discount subscription certificate in the above F name, which is a private document related to rights and obligations without authority, from that time to March 8, 2013.

2. From January 9, 2012 to March 8, 2013, the Defendant at the event of the above investigation document submitted the documents related to the opening of the cell phone, such as the sales contract of the cell phone, which is forged as set forth in paragraph (1), to the victim C, who is an agent of the above agency, as if the documents related to the opening of the cell phone have been genuinely formed, as well as from that time until March 8, 2013.