The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

On April 24, 2016, the Defendant, at the entrance stairs of the D church located in C around Won-si around 11:00, stated that the victim E, who is the above church, was to enter the said church in order to make a tugboat, and that the victim was dismissed, and that the victim was dismissed, the Defendant would be able to do so, and how the Defendant F, who is the Defendant’s first executive of the said church, would go beyond the stairs from the point where the victim was punished for the damage.

The body said that “the victim was tightly pushed the victim’s chest and the part of the victim’s chest and the part of the body with the hand, and the victim was assaulted by the victim, by her hand, by putting him/her into a dular, leading him/her to her.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent.

Since the injured person expressed his intention not to punish the accused after the public prosecution of this case was instituted, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.