The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal is that the sentence of the lower court (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, such as Defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive for the crime, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., considering the following factors: (a) the confession of the crime; (b) the confession of the crime; and (c) the fact that the amount of the penphone being handled is not large; (d) the repeated crime and the crime committed during the suspension of the execution period; (c) the fact that the person was punished by a fine for the same type of crime during the said period; (d) the purchase and administration of the penphones; and (e) the fact that the form of the crime is not less than easy; and (e) the response to the training of the phiphones as a result of the assessment of the phiphones, the sentence of the court below cannot be deemed unfair because it is too too unreasonable

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.