원고의 주장에 재심사유가 존재하지 않음[국승]
Supreme Court-2016-Du 65473 (Law No. 13, 2017)
Seoul High-2014-0076 (Law No. 21, 2014)
The plaintiff's assertion that there is no ground for retrial
There is no ground for retrial, and it is dismissed.
2017Du329 Revocation of Disposition Rejecting Transfer Income Tax Correction
LAA
BB Director of the Tax Office
December 5, 2017
The request for retrial is dismissed.
The litigation costs for retrial shall be borne by the plaintiff.
The grounds for request for retrial shall be examined.
In light of the relevant legal principles, even after examining the records, the Plaintiff (Plaintiff) asserts in the judgment subject to a retrial.
There is no reason for a retrial.
Therefore, the retrial of this case is dismissed, and the costs of retrial are assessed against the losing party.
It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.