beta
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Supreme Court-2016-Du 65473 (Law No. 13, 2017)
Case Number of the previous trial
Seoul High-2014-0076 (Law No. 21, 2014)
Title
The plaintiff's assertion that there is no ground for retrial
Summary
There is no ground for retrial, and it is dismissed.
Cases
2017Du329 Revocation of Disposition Rejecting Transfer Income Tax Correction
Plaintiff
LAA
Defendant
BB Director of the Tax Office
Imposition of Judgment
December 5, 2017
Text
The request for retrial is dismissed.
The litigation costs for retrial shall be borne by the plaintiff.
Reasons
The grounds for request for retrial shall be examined.
In light of the relevant legal principles, even after examining the records, the Plaintiff (Plaintiff) asserts in the judgment subject to a retrial.
There is no reason for a retrial.
Therefore, the retrial of this case is dismissed, and the costs of retrial are assessed against the losing party.
It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.