According to the reasoning of the judgment of the court below, the court below held that although the defendant acquired the registration title of the land of this case from the defendant Kim Jong-ho who was the original owner of the land of this case in exchange with the land of this case, the registration title of the land of this case was issued and registered by the defendant in accordance with the procedure stipulated in the Act on Special Measures for the Transfer of Real Estate Ownership, etc. (Act No. 3094 of Dec. 31, 197, Act No. 3094 of the Act on Special Measures for the Transfer of Real Estate Ownership in order to transfer the name of the land of this case to the defendant in the future, the defendant's above so-called constitutes a case where the defendant was issued a written confirmation by false means as provided in Article 13 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Measures for the Transfer of Real Estate Rights. The court below's decision is just in examining the above dispositions of this case through the records, even if the indication of the registration title of this case complies with the substantive relation, there is no complaint for the establishment of crimes as provided in Article 13 (see Supreme Court Decision).

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Shin Jong-young (Presiding Justice)