가.특수공무집행방해치상나.일반교통방해다.공용물건손상라.집회및시위에관한법률위반
2017Do14309 A. Special obstruction of performance of official duties
(b) General traffic obstruction;
(c) Damage to public goods;
(d) Violation of the Assembly and Demonstration Act;
CE
Prosecutor
Law Firm BM (Attorney in charge BN, BO, B Q)
Supreme Court Decision 2008Do6032 Decided October 15, 2014
Seoul High Court Decision 2014No3150, 2016No834 decided August 24, 2017
December 22, 2017
The appeal is dismissed.
The grounds of appeal are examined.
Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the records, including the evidence duly admitted, the lower court is justifiable to have rendered a not-guilty verdict on charges of interference with general traffic of the FLer on the grounds as stated in its reasoning, and there is no error by misapprehending the legal doctrine on interference with general traffic. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent
Justices Park Young-young
Justices Kim Jae-tae
Chief Justice Lee Dong-won
Justices Kim Jae-in