beta
Cases
2017Do14309 A. Special obstruction of performance of official duties
(b) General traffic obstruction;
(c) Damage to public goods;
(d) Violation of the Assembly and Demonstration Act;
Defendant
CE
Appellant
Prosecutor
Defense Counsel
Law Firm BM (Attorney in charge BN, BO, B Q)
Judgment of remand
Supreme Court Decision 2008Do6032 Decided October 15, 2014
The judgment below
Seoul High Court Decision 2014No3150, 2016No834 decided August 24, 2017
Imposition of Judgment
December 22, 2017
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
The grounds of appeal are examined.
Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the records, including the evidence duly admitted, the lower court is justifiable to have rendered a not-guilty verdict on charges of interference with general traffic of the FLer on the grounds as stated in its reasoning, and there is no error by misapprehending the legal doctrine on interference with general traffic. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent
Judges
Justices Park Young-young
Justices Kim Jae-tae
Chief Justice Lee Dong-won
Justices Kim Jae-in