logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.10.06 2016고단4812
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

In light of the above legal principles, it is reasonable to view that “A” under Article 18(1) of the former Enforcement Decree of the former Enforcement Decree of the former Enforcement Decree of the Act on the Protection, etc. of Victims and the Protection, etc. of Victims and the Protection, etc. of Victims and Protection, etc. of Victims and Protection, etc. of Victims and Protection, etc. of Victims and Protection, etc. of Victims and Protection, etc. of Victims and Protection, etc. of Victims and Protection, etc. of Victims and Protection, etc. of Victims and Protection, etc. of Victims and Protection, etc. of Victims

6) On September 27, 2012, the Defendant: (a) misrepresented the victim company counselor in the name of the Dongyang Life Company with phone calls to cancel the insurance product by deceiving C; and (b) received KRW 1,199,336 from the victim company as the refund amount for the termination of the insurance product on the same day; (c) around July 28, 2009, the Defendant forged a letter of personal credit loan agreement in the name of “C”, resident registration number “E”, resident registration address “Seoul Guro-gu FF lending******”), cell phone “G”, and forged a letter of personal credit loan agreement in the name of C, a private document, without authority, with the intent to exercise the right and duty of the applicant’s personal credit loan agreement on the same day.

2) On August 7, 2009, the Defendant, without authority, entered customer information name “C”, resident number “E”, “Seoul Guro-gu *******), “Handphone”, and “C” in the loan application form without authority, and forged one copy of C’s private document concerning rights and obligations by arbitrarily signing C on the applicant’s name. (3) On September 27, 2012, the Defendant, without authority, entered the details in the application form for the use of remittance account registration with the intent to exercise the right and duty in the paper for the use of the remittance account registration in the name of “C” and forged one copy of C’s application for the use of the remittance account registration service in the name of “C”, which is a private document related to rights and duties.

3...

arrow