logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 속초지원 2018.07.25 2017고정163
자동차관리법위반
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 2015, when an owner of a motor vehicle, who was not approved by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, intends to conduct the rinking on the items stipulated by Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, the Defendant, without obtaining approval from the competent authority, manufactured a campus at the c's c's c's c's c's c's c's c's c's c's c's c', located in Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, and changed the structure of the said cargo vehicle by installing the said c's c's c'

2. In spite of the fact that a person who operates an unapproved Pickinging vehicle is not allowed to operate a motor vehicle with the knowledge that it is a motor vehicle, without the approval of the competent authority, the Defendant operated a D Poter II truck, which is a non-approved Pickinging motor vehicle, on August 1, 2017, on the front of the cosmetic 10:00 at the early of the F Trackinging Office, as described in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. In light of the fact that: (a) internal investigation reports (on-site photographs) and investigation reports (in relation to telephone communications, etc. by a person in charge of the Korea Transportation Safety Authority; (b) the Defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the instant campus constitutes loaded cargo rather than adding an attachment as possible; (c) however, considering the size and weight of the campus in this case, it seems difficult to separate the campus in light of its size and weight; and (d) the Korea Transportation Safety Authority replys to the purport that it cannot be viewed as ordinary transportation if the special device is fixed on a cargo vehicle using an overwork, etc.; and (c) the Defendant’s installation of the instant campus in the truck vehicle constitutes a motor vehicle, i.e., e., twit learning.

Therefore, the above argument shall not be accepted.

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense and the former Automobile Management Act (amended by Act No. 1350, Dec. 2, 2015).

arrow