Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

Where an owner of a motor vehicle intends to conduct a tubes on the items prescribed by Ordinance of Ministry of Construction and Transportation of national land, he/she shall obtain approval from the head of a Si/Gun

Nevertheless, on April 15, 2017, the Defendant, without obtaining approval from the competent authority, installed a residential space for camping (one 'camb') in which it is possible to capture, cook, etc. at the loading box of D Ⅱ 1 ton cargo vehicles (hereinafter "cargo vehicle of this case") from a company located in Ansan-si B at Ansan-si (hereinafter "the instant cargo vehicle") and operated the cambing on a motor vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The criminal place;

1. Each investigation report (the attachment of a copy of the case records and the attachment of related precedents) / The Defendant asserts to the effect that punishing the Piping “inward” under the Automobile Management Act is unfair until the dwelling space for camping purposes (hereinafter “camper”) in which it is easy to separate as set up by the Defendant.

The following circumstances, which are acknowledged by the evidence of the judgment below, i.e., Article 2 subparag. 11 of the Automobile Management Act, provides that: (a) partially altering the tubes of “A” motor vehicle’s structure and devices to “B” or adding attached objects to “A” motor vehicle; (b) the instant campingus is combined with the loading of the instant cargo by using fixed devices; and (c) it is difficult to treat the instant cargo as being operated as fixed onto the instant cargo while being fixed until it is separated from the cargo vehicle; and (c) it is possible to set up the instant campingus.

In light of the fact that it is difficult to simply evaluate the installation of the instant campus as cargo loaded on the instant cargo vehicle, the Defendant’s act of installing the instant campus on the instant cargo vehicle is an addition to attached objects to the instant vehicle, and thus, the Defendant’s act of installing the instant campus on the instant cargo vehicle is deemed to be an “motor vehicle.”