logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 속초지원 2020.06.17 2018고정28
자동차관리법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Where an owner of an automobile who has violated the Motor Vehicle Management Act due to non-approval tubes intends to have tubes for items prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, he/she shall obtain approval from the competent authority;

Nevertheless, on July 31, 2017, the Defendant, without obtaining the approval of the competent authority, produced a campus at “C” company located in the vicinity B of Ansan-si, and changed the structure and devices of the said truck vehicle by installing the campus on the load box of the DB truck truck truck vehicle owned by himself.

2. No one who has violated the Motor Vehicle Management Act due to the operation of a non-approved motor vehicle shall operate a motor vehicle while knowing that it is a motor vehicle which has been tubesd without approval from the competent authority;

Nevertheless, as of October 6, 2017, the Defendant operated a DNA truck truck vehicle, which is a non-approved truck vehicle, on the front side of the Seocho-si Sports Center in 4299, as described in the foregoing paragraph (1), as of the early 4299 Seocho-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to internal reports, comprehensive details of vehicles, vehicle registration certificates, investigation reports (in relation to receipt, etc. of replies to the Traffic Safety Authority), etc.;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 81 subparag. 19 and 34(1) of the Motor Vehicle Management Act (the point of the tubes of unapproved motor vehicles), Articles 81 subparag. 20 and 34(1) of the Motor Vehicle Management Act (the point of operating unapproved motor vehicles), and selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant asserts that the establishment of the instant campus is nothing more than the loading of cargo that does not fall under the offenses, and that the establishment of the instant campus is nothing more than the distribution of cargo.

An owner of an automobile shall have tubes for the items prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (the partial alteration of structures and devices or addition of attached objects. Article 2, Article 11 of the Automobile Management Act).

arrow