A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

1. From July 2013, the Defendant: (a) operated a mobile phone sales store with the trade name “D” in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government from around July 2013; (b) requested the victim E to “the victim E to whom the operating fund is insufficient due to business depression to open a heavy phone in the name of the victim because of the need for performance; and (c) obtained his/her permission; and (d) disposed of a new mobile phone via a new mobile phone in his/her name, and then disposed of a new type of device supplied by a mobile phone operator, thereby raising funds.

Around August 16, 2013, at the above "D" mobile phone sales store operated by the Defendant, the F mobile phone opening-related crime (1) entered, without authority, the new service contract paper, the document sales contract paper for the terminal, the document sales contract paper for the terminal, the document discount system into each customer's customer information column of the application form with the name "E", resident registration number "G", etc. and submitted to the department in charge of SK Telecom Co., Ltd., each forged the application form for the service contract, the document sales contract for the terminal installment, and the fee discount system, which are private documents on the rights and obligations of the victim in the name of the victim, with the signature of the victim in the signature and seal column, with the signature of the victim.

(2) In the same date and place as, at the same time and place as, in the preceding paragraph of fraud, a new service contract under the above E, a contract for the installment of a device, and a contract for the discount of charges are forged; however, it was submitted to the victim SK Telecom Co., Ltd. with no knowledge of the fact as, as described in the preceding paragraph, and its equipment obtained F approval from the person in charge of the victimized company to join the mobile communication service of the victimized company, and obtained it by transfer of a mobile phone which is equivalent to 79,700 won.

B. Around August 18, 2013, the crime related to the opening of a mobile phone H mobile phone (1) without authority for the purpose of uttering at the aforementioned “D” mobile phone sales store operated by the Defendant around August 18, 2013.