Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

【2015 High Court Decision 2377】 The Defendant operated a mobile phone sales store in the name of “B”.

1. On June 9, 2013, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) on his/her own cell phone sales store operated by himself/herself, entered the victim DNA personal information in the “service new contract” kept at the same time with the aim of raising the opening of a cell phone at his/her mobile phone sales store; (b) enter the victim DNA information in the customer column; (c) enter the DNA personal information in the “sales contract for the cell phone sales contract for the cell phone; and (d) enter the applicant’s personal information in the “sales contract for the cell phone sales; and (d) arbitrarily puts his/her signature in the applicant customer column.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the defendant has forged a new service contract in the name of the victim D, which is a private document on the rights and obligations, and a sales contract in the form of a terminal.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the place specified in Paragraph (1) and at the same time and place, set up one application form for a new service contract in the name of D, and one copy of a sales contract for the terminal, respectively, and sent it to the above communications company via the SK Telecom Security Site and exercised it respectively.

[Judgment of the court below]

3. Around June 2013, the Defendant forged private document: (a) stated the victim E’s personal information in the “application for new entry” kept at that place with the aim of raising the results of opening a cell phone at the mobile phone sales store as indicated in paragraph (1) and arbitrarily signed E by stating that the victim E is “E” in the applicant column.

On the other hand, the defendant stated the victim F's personal information in the "application for new admission" and voluntarily signed F's name in the applicant column.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the defendant has forged a new application form in the name of victim E, which is a private document on rights and obligations, and one copy of a new application form in the name of victim F.

4. The Defendant at the time and place specified in Paragraph 3, one copy of an application for new entry in the name of the victim E, which was forged, and one victim.